Major Corporation Realizes 38% Cost Savings with Autonomous PII Redactions
Situation TCDI’s client, a major corporation, faced a court order to publish almost 4,000,000 documents to a public repository. Part of this mandate required a
For over 36 years, we’ve been a pioneer in the legal market, empowering law firms and corporate legal departments to secure, discover, analyze, and defend critical data. We specialize in large-scale litigation case management, eDiscovery, managed document review, computer forensics, and cybersecurity. On top of that, we continually build innovative proprietary legal technology solutions to efficiently organize and manage large volumes of data. Our team of experts dive deep to understand our clients’ specific needs and challenges and then work tirelessly to address them.
But don’t just take our word for it, the case studies below give you a taste of the type of work we’ve done and the results we’ve gotten. But more importantly, they tell you who we are. We are proud to be a company that listens to our clients, customizes solutions to fit their needs, and redefines what it means to be a partner.
Situation TCDI’s client, a major corporation, faced a court order to publish almost 4,000,000 documents to a public repository. Part of this mandate required a
Situation A large AmLaw 100 firm, renowned for defending and supporting privilege claims, faced the daunting task of generating exhaustive privilege logs. This process was
Situation A large manufacturing company’s current eDiscovery review platform was unable to effectively manage all of the relational documents and data needed for a complex
Situation A fortune 500 company needed to provide a secure environment to access and review documents in order to determine documents for submission to the
A law firm specializing in complex litigation contacted TCDI for an urgent cell phone forensics project. The attorney managing the case had been working around
Situation The law firm’s unitization and coding for pleadings, transcripts and exhibits was consistently incorrect and the client spent a lot of time and money correcting vendor
